From 2ddbc2b056af0585b905606a2c6887d43f9c3b01 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Leonardo Santiago <leonardo.ribeiro.santiago@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2024 17:30:03 -0300
Subject: localize bearblog, update some UI

---
 public/index.xml | 30 +++++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

(limited to 'public/index.xml')

diff --git a/public/index.xml b/public/index.xml
index e4dfa43..de69796 100644
--- a/public/index.xml
+++ b/public/index.xml
@@ -1,26 +1,26 @@
 <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
 <rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
   <channel>
-    <title>lowest case on lowestcase</title>
-    <link>http://localhost:1313/</link>
-    <description>Recent content in lowest case on lowestcase</description>
+    <title>home on lowest case</title>
+    <link>https://o-santi.github.com/</link>
+    <description>Recent content in home on lowest case</description>
     <generator>Hugo</generator>
     <language>en-US</language>
-    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2024 15:21:30 -0300</lastBuildDate>
-    <atom:link href="http://localhost:1313/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
-    <item>
-      <title>rust is not about memory safety</title>
-      <link>http://localhost:1313/rust-is-not-about-memory-safety/</link>
-      <pubDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2024 15:21:30 -0300</pubDate>
-      <guid>http://localhost:1313/rust-is-not-about-memory-safety/</guid>
-      <description>most of rust discussions nowadays revolve about memory safety, and how it is safer than C / C++ / zig / go / whatever language is being trashed on twitter that day. while yes, that is true - not that the bar for most of these is particularly high - what I think is the main point of the language is always glossed over: correctness. when one tries to criticize any of the aforementioned languages, one is answered with the following argument:</description>
-    </item>
+    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2024 17:29:17 -0300</lastBuildDate>
+    <atom:link href="https://o-santi.github.com/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
     <item>
       <title>about</title>
-      <link>http://localhost:1313/about/</link>
-      <pubDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2024 12:12:47 -0300</pubDate>
-      <guid>http://localhost:1313/about/</guid>
+      <link>https://o-santi.github.com/about/</link>
+      <pubDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2024 17:29:17 -0300</pubDate>
+      <guid>https://o-santi.github.com/about/</guid>
       <description>i&amp;rsquo;m leonardo santiago, a software engineer based in brazil. my interests are in compiler design, programming tools (emacs), functional programming, and proof languages. i&amp;rsquo;m most confortable in nix and rust, but i know a fair share of other languages.&#xA;currently, i work as a software engineer @ Mixrank, and you can find my curriculum here.&#xA;if you feel like smugly responding to any of my posts (or just want to kindly send me a message), these are my socials:</description>
     </item>
+    <item>
+      <title>rust is not about memory safety</title>
+      <link>https://o-santi.github.com/blog/rust-is-not-about-memory-safety/</link>
+      <pubDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2024 17:29:17 -0300</pubDate>
+      <guid>https://o-santi.github.com/blog/rust-is-not-about-memory-safety/</guid>
+      <description>most of rust discussions nowadays revolve about memory safety, and how it is safer than C / C++ / zig / go / whatever language is being trashed on twitter that day. while yes, that is true - not that the bar for most of these is particularly high - what I think is the main point of the language is always glossed over: correctness. when one tries to criticize any of the aforementioned languages, one is answered with the following argument:</description>
+    </item>
   </channel>
 </rss>
-- 
cgit v1.2.3