diff options
| author | Leonardo Santiago <[email protected]> | 2024-06-01 17:30:03 -0300 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Leonardo Santiago <[email protected]> | 2024-06-01 17:30:03 -0300 |
| commit | 2ddbc2b056af0585b905606a2c6887d43f9c3b01 (patch) | |
| tree | bfe1531d2cb9e5728c3d7038f2c086616efd539c /public/index.xml | |
| parent | 735b245871d94cb6ace8913cd1370b02b5aeb28b (diff) | |
localize bearblog, update some UI
Diffstat (limited to 'public/index.xml')
| -rw-r--r-- | public/index.xml | 30 |
1 files changed, 15 insertions, 15 deletions
diff --git a/public/index.xml b/public/index.xml index e4dfa43..de69796 100644 --- a/public/index.xml +++ b/public/index.xml @@ -1,26 +1,26 @@ <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?> <rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"> <channel> - <title>lowest case on lowestcase</title> - <link>http://localhost:1313/</link> - <description>Recent content in lowest case on lowestcase</description> + <title>home on lowest case</title> + <link>https://o-santi.github.com/</link> + <description>Recent content in home on lowest case</description> <generator>Hugo</generator> <language>en-US</language> - <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2024 15:21:30 -0300</lastBuildDate> - <atom:link href="http://localhost:1313/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /> - <item> - <title>rust is not about memory safety</title> - <link>http://localhost:1313/rust-is-not-about-memory-safety/</link> - <pubDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2024 15:21:30 -0300</pubDate> - <guid>http://localhost:1313/rust-is-not-about-memory-safety/</guid> - <description>most of rust discussions nowadays revolve about memory safety, and how it is safer than C / C++ / zig / go / whatever language is being trashed on twitter that day. while yes, that is true - not that the bar for most of these is particularly high - what I think is the main point of the language is always glossed over: correctness. when one tries to criticize any of the aforementioned languages, one is answered with the following argument:</description> - </item> + <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2024 17:29:17 -0300</lastBuildDate> + <atom:link href="https://o-santi.github.com/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /> <item> <title>about</title> - <link>http://localhost:1313/about/</link> - <pubDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2024 12:12:47 -0300</pubDate> - <guid>http://localhost:1313/about/</guid> + <link>https://o-santi.github.com/about/</link> + <pubDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2024 17:29:17 -0300</pubDate> + <guid>https://o-santi.github.com/about/</guid> <description>i&rsquo;m leonardo santiago, a software engineer based in brazil. my interests are in compiler design, programming tools (emacs), functional programming, and proof languages. i&rsquo;m most confortable in nix and rust, but i know a fair share of other languages.
currently, i work as a software engineer @ Mixrank, and you can find my curriculum here.
if you feel like smugly responding to any of my posts (or just want to kindly send me a message), these are my socials:</description> </item> + <item> + <title>rust is not about memory safety</title> + <link>https://o-santi.github.com/blog/rust-is-not-about-memory-safety/</link> + <pubDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2024 17:29:17 -0300</pubDate> + <guid>https://o-santi.github.com/blog/rust-is-not-about-memory-safety/</guid> + <description>most of rust discussions nowadays revolve about memory safety, and how it is safer than C / C++ / zig / go / whatever language is being trashed on twitter that day. while yes, that is true - not that the bar for most of these is particularly high - what I think is the main point of the language is always glossed over: correctness. when one tries to criticize any of the aforementioned languages, one is answered with the following argument:</description> + </item> </channel> </rss> |